RE: [security-services] SAML extensions example

[Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

> Hmm, yeah.  I was hoping that they would just be illustrative of the 
> mechanics of how you extend SAML types to do your own thing, and looking 
> at XTAML at this point would probably just be confusing.  Do you think 
> Liberty would serve all right in this capacity?

I think *parts* of Liberty do, but some parts end up confusing a person if they don't have time to look deeper.

Extending Request and Response can throw one for a loop, for example, whereas extending Subject or AuthenticationStatement is more
in keeping with the point you're trying to make.

1.2 goes a little farther along those lines, with several new Statements, for example.

-- Scott