[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] problem with B&P alternative SAML artifactformat... Treat this a s an ISSUE or Editorial?
I meant to ask about that yesterday, having come across it when I did the cm:artifact changes, and clean forgot... I agree that this should be considered an editorial error. We had better make sure there's an E/PE number for it, so people can track it, though! Eve Philpott, Robert wrote: > The V1.0 B&P spec, Line 941, lists the identifier for the alternative > SAML Artifact Format as > "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:draft-sstc-bindings-model-13:profiles:artifact-02". > > > > I am REALLY assuming that this was a simple cut/paste error in the V1.0 > spec. The urn should have been > "urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:profiles:artifact-02" to be consistent with > the type 1 artifact profile. The urn shouldn't have had the draft > document name embedded in it. > > > > I want to treat this as an editorial change rather than saying the old > urn is deprecated in V1.1 and being removed in 2.0. It seems obvious to > me that no one would have really used that urn to refer to the profile. > This urn shouldn't appear anywhere in any code anyway as we're not > talking about the confirmation method issue. This is just the urn we > defined to refer to the general profile using the alternate artifact format. > > > > If anyone has an objection to my taking editorial privilege on this > item, please speak up ASAP! > > > > *Rob Philpott* > *RSA Security Inc.* > /The Most Trusted Name in e-Security/ > *Tel: 781-515-7115* > *Mobile**: 617-510-0893* > *Fax: 781-515-7020* > mailto:rphilpott@rsasecurity.com > > > -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems cell +1 781 354 9441 Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]