RE: [security-services] Proposed Charter Update

["Conor P. Cahill" <concahill@aol.com>]

Scott Cantor wrote on 11/16/2003, 8:59 PM:
 >
 > Speaking for myself, I actually like some of these proposed
 > edits (e.g. there's no reason why non-SAML-based work can't
 > be considered for input into the work that we do).

I don't think we need to change the proposed charter update to allow the 
submission and consideration of non-SAML based work.  I believe that any 
work can be submitted for consideration by the SSTC.

Conor