Subject: RE: [security-services] Belated agenda for today's focus group call
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, John Hughes wrote: > - Authentication Method Identifiers > - Confirmation method identifiers > > I'm not clear in my own mind whether the last two should be in this > document - or remain in the core/profile/bindings doc set. Well, wherever they belong it wouldn't be here. This is about names of SAML Attributes, not identifiers in other schema elements. > - Normalization of various "common" attribute naming schemes - e.g KRB, > DCE, Windows 2000 normalization in what sense? Regarding LDAP/X.500, the interesting scope question to me is whether, as I have heard suggested, there should be a listing of actual attribute definitions (attribute types in X.500 terms), eg commonName, that should form some base good-to-implement list. I can see the appeal in this, but it can also be a can of worms, since, among other reasons, some of these attribute types themselves are not necessarily defined with the precision one might like for particular applications (eg "mail"). I think that if this is needed it can be a post-2.0 thing. - RL "Bob"