security-services message

Subject: RE: [security-services] shouul "entityId" nameid-format be just"entity"?

From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: "'Philpott, Robert'" <rphilpott@rsasecurity.com>,"'oasis sstc (E-mail)'" <security-services@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 14:12:45 -0400

> Thus, for consistency, I think 
> urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:entityID should be 
> changed to urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:entity.

+1, I like that better.

-- Scott

References:
- shouul "entityId" nameid-format be just "entity"?
  - From: "Philpott, Robert" <rphilpott@rsasecurity.com>