[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] AI-#0165: Proposed Errata Process for SAML 2.0
> This sounds like a good plan. I just wanted to point out explicitly > that the errata process you propose is for "temporary" errata on the way > from Committee Draft to OASIS Standard, just as we did before. The > purpose would be to allow implementors to easily track minor changes and > cleanup that take place during Committee Draft stage as the result of > final review. It may be all we can get away with, but it's not what we really need, which is a way to normatively correct errors in the spec after the vote is done. Going through the whole process again is pretty heavy-weight for correcting mistakes, if the TC collectively agrees that it's a mistake. Pretending everything gets caught during the voting is pretty unrealistic as the spec gets bigger. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]