Subject: RE: [security-services] proposed SAML artifact definition
Additionally, the 'referring' is somewhat redundant given the 'referential data object'. So perhaps "A small referential data object communicated in place of a SAML protocol message ..." Paul >-----Original Message----- >From: Scott Cantor [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] >Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 8:41 PM >To: 'Jeff Hodges'; 'oasis sstc' >Subject: RE: [security-services] proposed SAML artifact definition > > >> SAML artifact >> >> A small referential data object referring to another SAML >data object, >> typically a SAML protocol message, held by a system entity >participating >> in an exchange of SAML protocol messages. The SAML Artifact format >> is defined in the HTTP Artifact binding in [SAMLBind]. > >One might argue we should have just changed the name of the thing. ;-) > >Anyway, FWIW, within SAML 2.0, it *always* refers to a SAML protocol >message, so one might also argue we should just say so, as opposed to >"another SAML data object, typically a..." > >-- Scott > > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the >roster of the OASIS TC), go to >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/ members/leave_workgroup.php.