[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [security-services] proposed SAML artifact definition
ext Paul Madsen wrote: >Additionally, the 'referring' is somewhat redundant given the 'referential >data object'. So perhaps > >"A small referential data object communicated in place of a SAML protocol >message ..." > > The above doesn't reflect that the artifact in fact /points/ (or refers) to the SAML protocol message. One might simply say: "SAML Artifact: A pointer to a SAML protocol message. The SAML artifact format is defined..." - JohnK >Paul > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] >>Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 8:41 PM >>To: 'Jeff Hodges'; 'oasis sstc' >>Subject: RE: [security-services] proposed SAML artifact definition >> >> >> >> >>>SAML artifact >>> >>> A small referential data object referring to another SAML >>> >>> >>data object, >> >> >>>typically a SAML protocol message, held by a system entity >>> >>> >>participating >> >> >>>in an exchange of SAML protocol messages. The SAML Artifact format >>>is defined in the HTTP Artifact binding in [SAMLBind]. >>> >>> >>One might argue we should have just changed the name of the thing. ;-) >> >>Anyway, FWIW, within SAML 2.0, it *always* refers to a SAML protocol >>message, so one might also argue we should just say so, as opposed to >>"another SAML data object, typically a..." >> >>-- Scott >> >> >>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the >>roster of the OASIS TC), go to >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/ >> >> >members/leave_workgroup.php. > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security-services/members/leave_workgroup.php. > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]