[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] Additional comments on core-02
> If this is what was meant, does this imply that when there is a name > identifier, the entity that satisfies the subject confirmation cannot be > treated as the entity that > the authority associates with the claims in the assertion? That's certainly not my intent. Rob? > I think that the relying party should be allowed to make either > association; when the name identifier is present. Agree. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]