RE: [security-services] "Registration" process for third-party SAML customizations

["Linn, John" <jlinn@rsasecurity.com>]

Proposed tweak to one sentence: 

...

The SSTC reserves the right not to list any SAML-based specification, 
and no endorsement by the SSTC of any such specification is implied. 
The SSTC [link: IPR declaration page] does not apply to such 
specifications.  This listing is a courtesy only.

...

Suggest replacement for first sentence: "The SSTC does not imply endorsement of any SAML-based specification, and reserves the right not to list all received submissions."  As written (even given the disclaimer in the final sentence), I could imagine someone parsing the first sentence's clause structure to infer that the "no endorsement" clause applies only to specifications that the SSTC decides not to list. 

--jl