[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Conformance document questions
Some things we noticed here recently about the sstc-saml-conformance-2.0-cd-02.pdf document: Table 4 only discusses responder conformance requirements, but does not define ny request requirements. I suppose you could turn "must process" on the responder into "must send" on the server, but is that the intent; if so, it should be made explicit. Or is requestor conformance currently unspecified by design? The Identity Provider proxy references section 3.4.1.6 of the core; should that be 3.4.1.5 (since .6 doesn't exist)? /r$ -- Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]