[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Status re Gross response [Was: RE: [security-services] Agenda for 1-Mar SSTC con-call]
>We had planned to entertain a motion to move the Thomas Gross response document to CD status (sstc-gross-sec-analysis-response->01.pdf). But as per the 1-Feb con-call, we were going to provide Thomas Gross a copy and provide him an opportunity to respond. >I do not recall an AI nor saw any mail to him from someone to do this. So do we still wish to move this to CD status?
Early in February, Prateek sent a message to Thomas; he responded shortly thereafter indicating interest in reviewing the SSTC document. I don’t believe that I’ve seen any further discussion on it since then (from Thomas or within the TC), however.
Paging through the -01 .pdf now, I see a couple of editorial fine points:
Line 84: “security services” -> “security service”
Line 167, delete comma following “specifications”