comments: sstc-saml-protocol-ext-thirdparty-cd-01

["Tom Scavo" <trscavo@gmail.com>]

Document identifier: sstc-saml-protocol-ext-thirdparty-cd-01

Errata:

- [line 2] s/SAML/SAML V2.0/

- [line 78, 80, 89] s/Section/section/

- [lines 88--89] s/The extension to [SAML2Meta] in/The SAML V2.0
metadata extension defined in/

- [line 91] s/A requester/Moreover, a requester/

- [line 92] s/<samlpext:RespondTo>/<thrpty:RespondTo>/

- [line 125] s/element of or derived from/element derived from/

- [line 130] s/fragmentary/fragment of an/

- [line 134] s/SAML/SAML:2.0/

- [line 142, 145, 148, 151] s/SSTC/Standard/

- [line 143] s^http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security/^http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/v2.0/saml-core-2.0-os.pdf^

- [line 146] s^http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security/^http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/v2.0/saml-bindings-2.0-os.pdf^

- [line 147] s/,//

- [line 149] s^http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security/^http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/v2.0/saml-metadata-2.0-os.pdf^

- [line 152] s^http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security/^http://docs.oasis-open.org/security/saml/v2.0/saml-profiles-2.0-os.pdf^

- [line 155] s^http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/^http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/^

Comments/Suggestions:

- Does this profile need Required Information?

- [lines 79--81] Does line 3317 of SAMLCore apply if no Format
attribute is provided?  If so, perhaps this requires some
clarification in the current profile.

- [lines 114--117] Append this sentence: In particular, the use of
this extension in conjunction with the SAML SOAP Binding [SAML2Bind]
is undefined.

- [line 128] The syntax of this attribute should agree with the syntax
used in the X.509 Attribute Sharing profile, that is, both profiles
should use the same syntax, either 'supportsRespondTo' or
'hasRespondToSupport'.  It doesn't matter which, but the two should be
consistent.

Tom