OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

security-services message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [Fwd: [security-services-chair] Agenda for SSTC Conference Call,August 29]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[security-services-chair] Agenda for SSTC Conference Call, 
August 29
Date: 	Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:47:03 -0400
From: 	Prateek Mishra <prateek.mishra@oracle.com>
To: 	security-services-chair@lists.oasis-open.org

Dial in info: +1 865 673 6950; Access code: 270-9441#

1. Roll Call & Agenda Review, Appoint Secretary

2. Approve minutes from August 15 con-call

(includes correction)

3. Informational: NZ Government Authentication Standards Launched


We really would appreciate feedback and comment on NZ SAMS and in fact 
all aspects of the Programme.

4. New errata composite drafts published

5. Public Review - Next Steps


The TC may conduct any number of review cycles (i.e. approval to send a 
Committee Draft to Public Review,
collecting comments, making edits to the specification, etc.). The first 
public review of a specification
must take place for a minimum of 60 days, and any subsequent reviews 
must be held for a minimum of 15 days.
Changes made to a specification after a review must be clearly 
identified in any subsequent review,
and the subsequent review shall be limited in scope to changes made in 
the previous review. Before starting
another review cycle the specification must be re-approved as a 
Committee Draft and then approved to go to
public review by the TC.

If Substantive Changes are made to the specification after the public 
review, whether as a result of public
review comments or from Member input, then the TC must conduct another 
review cycle. The specification may
not be considered for approval by the TC as a Committee Specification 
until it has undergone a review cycle during
which it has received no comments that result in Substantive Changes to 
the specification.

(a) Three updated drafts proposed for CD and new cycle of public review




(b) sstc-saml-x509-authn-attrib-profile-draft

Need champions (rebekah, ari) to respond to comments

6. Errata Review

(a) errata: incorrect URI in SAMLCore

(b) errata: vacuous ref to <Request> element

7. Discussion on "yellow text" portions of latest technical overview


8. Open AIs

#0264: Comment on "attribute-based federation" section
Owner: Prateek Mishra
Status: Open
Assigned: 2006-08-28
Due: ---


#0263: NameID and the use of SPProvidedID
Owner: Jahan Moreh
Status: Open
Assigned: 2006-07-18
Due: ---


#0262: Creation of the “new” LDAP/X.500 profile
Owner: Scott Cantor
Status: Open
Assigned: 2006-07-18
Due: ---


#0261: Chairs to contact GUIDE for follow-up
Status: Open
Assigned: 2006-07-18
Due: ---


#0240: Status of SAML 2.0 submission to ITU T
Owner: Abbie Barbir
Status: Open
Assigned: 2005-11-08
Due: ---

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]