[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] sstc-saml-approved-errata-2.0-cd-01 erratum?
> But it seems pretty clear, from Section 8.3.1 of [SAMLCore] and from E60 > of the Approved Errata, that the correct URI should be: > > urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified Yes, it is. If the format in 2.0 had the same meaning as the old, we left the URI alone. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]