Re: [security-services] FW: [saml-dev] Metadata and DNSSEC

[Peter Davis <peter.davis@neustar.biz>]

Yep.  I'd say so, but trivial ad most.  I can take the AI to propose the
(minimal) text required to add to the Errata work.

=peterd


On 9/10/2007 11:24 AM, "Brian Campbell" <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> wrote:

> I'm honestly not at all familiar with these RFC's but it sounds like we
> have a potential erratum item?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Davis [mailto:peter.davis@neustar.biz]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 3:10 PM
> To: Scott Cantor; 'Josh Howlett'; saml-dev
> Subject: Re: [saml-dev] Metadata and DNSSEC
> 
> We should publish errata for SAMLMeta2.0 on this.  I've read through the
> updated RFC's (4033-5)... Only 4035 applies wrt SAMLMeta, and, since
> SAMLMeta does not introduce any new requirements on signed zones or
> resolves, it should be a simple s/2535/4035/g operation.
> 
> =peterd
> 
> 
> On 8/9/2007 11:10 AM, "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote:
> 
>>> RFC2535 was obseleted by RFCs 4033-5 (one month after the publication
> 
>>> of SAMLMeta2). Can anyone clarify what, if any, consideration has
>>> been given to this?
>> 
>> Zero. The section was copied with minimal, if any, changes from ID-FF.
>> 
>> -- Scott
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: saml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: saml-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>> 
> 
> =peterd  ( http://xri.net/=peterd )
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: saml-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: saml-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> 

=peterd  ( http://xri.net/=peterd )