OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

security-services message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [security-services] work product review

Mary McRae wrote on 2009-10-27:
>     I don't think most TCs do this, but that's fine - although it
> needs to reference the specific version of the spec it's associated
> with (not the filename, but the reference).

I'll just label the reference then.

>    On the other hand, no schema was previously identified; nor was it
> included in the public review notice; nor does it live at the location
> you've identified. Would the addition of a normative schema not be a
> substantive change?

Then there was an oversight, because I uploaded a fresh copy of the schema
along with the documents. I do this for every transition stage, even if the
scheme hasn't changed, so that Kavi will display them together. You'll see
it grouped with both CD-01 (the public-reviewed version) and CD-02.

I have no idea what was or wasn't in the review notice. The schema is inside
the document as well as in its own file, like all the SAML documents have
done. The rules changed and the schema file can be the normative one now.

-- Scott

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]