[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Starter Documents for SAML Version 2.1
Hi Scott,I'll be happy to prepare the docs with two-digit numbering..It will help the parts appear in order in file listings, etc.(Instead of:part1part10part2part3...)No need to submit additional request form(s).Should be back to you a bit later today...Best regards,Paul
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Cantor, Scott <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote:On 9/14/12 1:10 PM, "Paul Knight" <paul.knight@oasis-open.org> wrote:I figured.
>
>I think it would be acceptable to renumber the Working Drafts before they
>are published as a Committee Specification Draft (CSD), but we wouldn't
>want to renumber after the initial publication. Additional parts could
>be added (with incremental numbers),
> but it would be very problematic to alter the existing part numbers
>after publication.
I think that would be wise just in case if you want to use a fixed width
>It sounds as though we might want to at least modify the initial
>documents to use a two-digit numbering scheme (part01, part02, etc.).
>Please let me know if you want to do this.
for the number.
Our problem is we aren't far enough into the process to know yet, and when
>Renumbering is not very easy, since the Parts contain references to each
>other, as well as having metadata elements (document properties),
>footers, and front page formatting keyed to the Part number. It would be
>best to have it planned out as much as possible
> before going far... I'll be happy to produce a different set of starter
>documents if needed.
we did it originally, we didn't have numbered documents.
I don't mind having to adjust the metadata in the event I have to renumber.
Should I fill out a new ticket to request the two digit numbering or can
you take care of that?
Yes, we did that originally, that's nothing new.
>It's fine to have varying WD numbers submitted together, to be published
>as a single CSD with a common CSD number. It will be really important to
>get all the parts together into a single ZIP file (including all schemas,
>etc.) and have the TC vote on the
> ZIP file as a whole.
>
Thanks.
>You're welcome... and I'll be happy to prepare a modified set if needed.
-- Scott
--
Paul Knight - Tel: +1 781-861-1013
OASIS - Advancing open standards for the information society
Document Process Analyst
Attachment:
saml-v2.1-wd01-new1.zip
Description: Zip archive
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]