Re: Use Case & Requirements Doc Strawman 1 Issues List

[Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>]

> ISSUE[UC-1-02:ThirdParty] Use case scenario 3 (single sign-on, third
> party) describes a scenario in which a Web user logs in to a
> particular 3rd-party security provider which returns an authentication
> reference that can be used to access multiple destination Web
> sites. Is this different than Use case scenario 1 (single sign-on,
> pull model)? If not, should it be removed from the use case and
> requirements document?

This is clearly a case of redundancy.  If it is a third-party security provider or business party
ought to be technology-independent IMO.