[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Ballot Attached - Group 3: Sessions
>>>>> "EP" == Evan Prodromou <evan@outlook.net> writes: JH> rationale: I believe this is subsummed within the topic of JH> [UC-3-1:UserSession] and we should deal with it explicitly in JH> that context. EP> So, I'm kind of confused by this rationale. Actually, on review, I've noticed that it was actually David's idea to remove these requirements. I still don't understand why, but I see I was directing my questions at the wrong person. David: why? B-) I find this even more puzzling, because those were req'ts pulled out of ITML and posted to this list. Was there a reason you didn't want the explicit logout, timeout, etc. requirements? ~ESP
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC