RE: ISSUE:[UC-6-01:XMLProtocol]

[Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@entegrity.com>]

I think the heart of the issue is "should we mandate support for SOAP?" I am
not close to these efforts, but my impression is that SOAP is an interim
thing which will go away soon. Please give us the benefit of your knowledge
in this area.

Hal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Orchard, David [mailto:dorchard@jamcracker.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 10:06 PM
> To: security-use@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: ISSUE:[UC-6-01:XMLProtocol]
> 
> 
> There is no such deliverable as XML Protocol specification.  
> We don't know
> when an XMLP 1.0 spec will ship.  We can NEVER have forward 
> references in
> specifications.  When XMLP ships, we can easily change the 
> requirements.
> 
> There is SOAP 1.1.  
> 
> Dave Orchard
> XML Architect
> Jamcracker Inc.,    19000 Homestead Dr., Cupertino, CA 95014
> p: 408.864.5118     m: 604.908.8425    f: 408.725.4310
> 
> www.jamcracker.com - Sounds like a job for Jamcracker.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: 
> security-use-request@lists.oasis-open.org
>