Re: [soa-blueprints] links to implementations

[Michael Stiefel <development@reliablesoftware.com>]

I assume then we will not have a call on Thursday.

Are you proposing Monday as the standard call day? I assume it is better 
for everyone to know as far as possible in advance what the call day will be.

Michael

At 10:02 AM 9/27/2005, Mark Little wrote:
>That's fine with me, but under OASIS rules, unless the later call is 
>formal, it wouldn't be sufficient to maintain voting rights. Obviously if 
>it were formal and anyone who attended the prior meeting didn't attend the 
>AsiaPac meeting, they'd then run the risk of losing voting rights if they 
>missed the next formal meeting.
>
>Mark.
>
>
>Miko Matsumura wrote:
>
>>Hi Everyone,
>>
>>Results from the informal poll are in:
>>
>>Quick Summary of Voting Results: - 8AM PST (GMT-008) received 13 Votes
>>- 9AM PST received 18 Votes
>>- 1PM PST received 7 Votes
>>- 4PM PST received 3 Votes
>>- 7PM PST received 0 Votes
>>- 10PM PST received 3 Votes
>>
>>I think it's best that we go with 9AM Pacific Time, and we hold perhaps
>>a later informational call for AsiaPac...
>>
>>How would Monday October 3 be for a next call date?
>>
>>Best,
>>Miko
>>
>>
>
>--
>Mark Little
>Chief Architect
>Arjuna Technologies Ltd
>www.arjuna.com
>