Re: [soa-eerp] Re: meeting time and frequency

["William Cox" <wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com>]

To be clear, I'm proposing next meeting as 2 hours, and the frequency tobe determined.

Bill
------Original Message------
From: Rex Brooks
To: William Cox
To: Hong Zhou
Cc: soa-eerp@lists.oasis-open.org
Sent: Apr 22, 2009 5:17 PM
Subject: [soa-eerp] Re: meeting time and frequency

Hi Everyone,

I'm not sure I could manage 2 hours every week. There are a number of 
issues that I don't want to take up until after the SOA Reference 
Architecture is approved for its second 60-Day Public Review. There 
are also a couple of issues I don't want to  bring up until after the 
conclusion of the SOA Harmonization  efforts being jointly conducted 
by some of the SOA groups in OMG, The Open Group and OASIS.

The SOA Harmonization should provide a fairly stable and 
well-supported framework within which many SOA efforts and the work 
of this TC should be considered in terms of where such efforts fit. 
The primary consideration I would suggest would be clearly stating 
that the work of this TC focuses on solution architectures at a very 
concrete level. At least, that is the impression I have gotten from 
the contributions thus far.

Cheers,
Rex

At 4:59 PM -0400 4/22/09, William Cox wrote:
>Hong -
>
>That would fit in with the discussion we started at the most recent meeting.
>
>Increasing frequency may be a burden, particularly if we start 
>tonight; I will (unless there are objections privately or to the 
>list) set the next meeting, on April 29/30, to start one hour 
>earlier.
>
>If people want to talk (not as a TC meeting without a vote first) 
>today/tomorrow (April 22/23) I might be able to open the bridges, 
>but we can't have an official TC meeting. I'll check with the the 
>process to try to make that workable.
>
>The TC voted to concentrate on getting BQoS out first, but there may 
>be some confusion if only one spec is visible at a time. I believe 
>there was consensus that the three specs should be worked on, but 
>that there are significant issues (and more issues with Rating and 
>BSLA), so we have to recognize those.
>
>Could interested people get together off line to talk about the 
>drafts and issues? I'm think that Hong, Szu Chang, Carl, and me 
>might be a good combination.
>
>Also if we extend meeting time, PLEASE SHOW UP AT THE START.  We've 
>lost 25-30% of each meeting to people not showing up on time.
>
>Thanks!
>
>bill
>--
>
>William Cox
>Email: <mailto:wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com>wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
>Web: 
><http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com>http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
>+1 862 485 3696 mobile
>+1 908 277 3460 fax
>
>
>Hong Zhou wrote:
>
>>Bill and all,
>>
>>In order to speed up the process, I would like to propose that we
>>1. increase the meeting time from 1 hour to 2 hours per session;
>>2. increase the meeting frequency from biweekly to weekly
>>starting from next week.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Hong


-- 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670


Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T