Re: [soa-eerp] Response to Issue 1005

["Hong Zhou" <eerp_hz@changfeng.org.cn>]

 I agreed with Andy’s assessment that all units in bQoS are required

 and shouldn’t be simplified. Looking into the example in Line 393 and
 on:

 393 (01) <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 394 (02) <bqos:BQoS xmlns:bqos="..." ... >
 395 (03) <bqos:BQoSPrice
 396 (04) <bqos:Price>
 397 (05) <bqos:Unit unitCode="EA">1000</bqos:Unit>
 398 (06) <!-- CNY: Chinese Yuan -->
 399 (07) <bqos:Amount currencyID="CNY">120000</bqos:Amount>
 400 (08) </bqos:Price>
 401 (09) </bqos:BQoSPrice>
 402 (10) <bqos:BQoSPerformance>
 403 (11) <bqos:Throughput>
 404 (12) <!-- delivery: 1 week -->
 405 (13) <bqos:Duration unitCode="DAY">7</bqos:Duration>
 406 (14) <!-- batch production, generally 1000 sets a batch -->
 407 (15) <bqos:Quantity>1000</bqos:Quantity>
 408 (16) <bqos:Latency unitCode="DAY">0</bqos:Latency>
 409 (17) </bqos:Throughput>
 410 (18) </bqos:BQoSPerformance>
 411 (19) <bqos:BQoSQualities>
 …
 426 (32) </bqos:BQoSQualities>
 427 (33) </bqos:BQoS>

 The unitCode on Price, Duration and Latency are all required for
 describing Price and Time.

 Propose to close this issue with no action.

From: Andy Lee

Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 5:51 PM

To: soa-eerp@lists.oasis-open.org

Subject: [soa-eerp] Response to Issue 1005

I have reviewed the examples provided in the bQoS Spec. From those
examples, I think all units in the bQoS schema are useful, and we
should keep all units in the schema.

 

 

Andy