OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm-editors message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [soa-rm-editors] reminder: deadline is upon us...

Attached is what I have so far for section 3 - conformance guidelines.  

I feel like it is pretty lite, and I really only used what was in section 2
of the document to determine what should go in here.

I assumed that conformance guidelines are really a short list of essential
shall statements identifying what every architecture must have in order to
be conformant, wherease section 2 is a more thourough explanation of what
those items are.

Question: I didn't see anything in the semantics section of the document
(section 2.3) that indicated that it was an essention element as such for an
SOA.  There was some text saying semantics of a service may be documented,
but the language seems to imply that it is not essential.

Also, after writing this short (but incredibly concise ; ) section, I still
think that we have identified necessary items, but not sure we have all of
the essential items.  In particular, we don't deal with service granularity
(i.e., a service shall be limited in scope to provide a specific function,
but it will not provide the process flow - with the exception of an
orchestration service), and we don't deal with the idea of a standard
mechanism for binding to a service (i.e., the idea that service providers
"plug into" some sort of virtual backplane.

This email may really be better sent to the whole TC - but I thought I would
forward to the editors first to see if I missed anything obvious.

Matt - I made the deadline with tons of time to spare!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 2:05 PM
To: Christopher Bashioum
Cc: soa-rm-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-editors] reminder: deadline is upon us...

How about 23:59.59?


Christopher Bashioum wrote:

>Thanks for the polite push ; ) 
>Question, does Wednesday mean Wednesday AM, or does it really mean by 12:01
>AM Thursday? 
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com] 
>Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 11:32 AM
>To: soa-rm-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: [soa-rm-editors] reminder: deadline is upon us...
>So far I have initial submissions from Vikas, Frank, John and Michael.  
>This is a friendly reminder that some of you guys are still on the hook 
>for content by Wednesday. 

Section 3 Conformance Guidelines.doc

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]