OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm-ra message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: chat log for issue resolution


(more details in issues spreadsheet 080815-issues (completed).xls)  

Ken Laskey: (8/15/2007 07:23) Ken is scribe until noon ET
  Ken Laskey: (07:24) begin going through issues list from we we last left
off
  Ken Laskey: (07:24) begin with issue 64 on 080807-issues.xls
  Ken Laskey: (07:34) mod made, issues updated
  Ken Laskey: (07:34) issue 65: mod made, issues updated
  Ken Laskey: (8/15/2007 08:07) issue 73: moved material to section 3.1
  Ken Laskey: (08:11) interlude: second sentence in section 3.2 is redundant
and removed
  Ken Laskey: (08:11) issue 74: issue on graphic
  Duane Nickull: (08:16) duane cell 604 726 3329
  Ken Laskey: (08:28) Frank redrawing graphic, considering as extension of
Figure 3
  Ken Laskey: (08:29) as guidance,
  Ken Laskey: (08:29) issue 75: accept
  Ken Laskey: (08:44) issue 74: graphic clarified
  Ken Laskey: (08:46) noted that in fig 4 the participant was really just a
consumer; graphic further modified
  Ken Laskey: (08:53) issue 76: consensus was to keep intermediary but label
it Interaction instead of Activity
  Ken Laskey: (09:00) issue 77: move Resource section before N&C section so
have resource defined
  Ken Laskey: (09:09) issue 79: accept
  Ken Laskey: (09:13) issue 78: Accepted - text modified.  Book was meant to
be a copy of the same published item rather than different titles.
Locations can be differentiated.
  Ken Laskey: (09:16) Suggestion to move example to resource section,
discuss as part of ownership, and possibly move to more focused example
  Ken Laskey: (09:27) [discussion of extent to which need to go into details
of social structure vs. noting that contaxt can depend on social structure,
especially when crossing ownership boundaries is crossing social structure
boundaries.]
  Ken Laskey: (09:27) s/contaxt/context/
  Ken Laskey: (09:40) after discussion, example and will deal with under
social structure
  Ken Laskey: (09:42) issue80: accepted
  Ken Laskey: (09:44) issue 81: accepted
Duane Nickull: (8/15/2007 12:58) I emailed the chat hostiry so I cleared the box
Duane Nickull: (12:58) hostiry = history
Ken Laskey: (13:20) issue 84: accept.  Need more discussion of Figure 5, partly from proposition material that was starngely numbered as 3.3.1.1
Ken Laskey: (13:27) Rex: for RA, we can only deal with measurable aspects of needs although some aspects may not be easily quantifiable.
Ken Laskey: (13:27) Frank: need owner is one who decides whether need addressed
Ken Laskey: (13:30) For this RA, a need is expressed by a measurable state?
Ken Laskey: (13:34) [modifying text defining Need and following paragraphs]
Ken Laskey: (13:44) [discussion of figs 5 and 9, whether redundant, whether different aspects, and where does it all go in document.]
Ken Laskey: (13:55) [discussion of need to define Proposition.  Not a term that will resonate well with DoD audience]
Ken Laskey: (13:55) how does proposition mesh with the idea of requirements
Ken Laskey: (14:21) ACTION: Frank to work on section for propositions
Ken Laskey: (14:24) issue 85: accept with additional rewording
Ken Laskey: (14:26) issue 86: reject for consistency with other diagrams
Ken Laskey: (14:27) issue 87: accept
Ken Laskey: (14:29) issue  88:reject per issue 86
Ken Laskey: (14:32) issue 89: will include W3C reference
Ken Laskey: (14:34) issue 90: no, can have multiple identifiers to same resource but any identifier should unambiguously resolve to the intended resource
Ken Laskey: (14:46) issues 92-102: defer until see what is required to be discussed as the rest of the document is developed
Ken Laskey: (14:52) issue 4: accept
Ken Laskey: (14:53) issue 29: accepted
Ken Laskey: (15:23) remaining issues (2,3,28,55-57,83,85): accepted or moot
Ken Laskey): (15:54) [back from break after finish issues]
Ken Laskey): (15:55) discussion of next review cycle
Ken Laskey: (16:21) 1. discuss governance at 22 August telecon following on discussion and points Frank captured
Ken Laskey: (16:23) 2. send out working draft v0.2 out for RM TC review.  Send out by 20 August with target date of 15 Septemebr for comments


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ken Laskey

MITRE Corporation, M/S H305     phone:  703-983-7934

7515 Colshire Drive                        fax:        703-983-1379

McLean VA 22102-7508




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]