OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm-ra message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: FW: Chat



-- 
**********************************************************************
"Speaking only for myself"
Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Community Music - http://www.mix2r.com
My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
MAX 2007 - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/07/adobe-max-2007.html
**********************************************************************

------ Forwarded Message
From: <dnickull@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: <dnickull@adobe.com>
Subject: Chat

  Duane Nickull: (8/15/2007 09:58) I emailed the chat hostiry so I cleared
the box
  Duane Nickull: (09:58) hostiry = history
  Ken Laskey: (10:20) issue 84: accept.  Need more discussion of Figure 5,
partly from proposition material that was starngely numbered as 3.3.1.1
  Ken Laskey: (10:27) Rex: for RA, we can only deal with measurable aspects
of needs although some aspects may not be easily quantifiable.
  Ken Laskey: (10:27) Frank: need owner is one who decides whether need
addressed
  Ken Laskey: (10:30) For this RA, a need is expressed by a measurable
state?
  Ken Laskey: (10:34) [modifying text defining Need and following
paragraphs]
  Ken Laskey: (10:44) [discussion of figs 5 and 9, whether redundant,
whether different aspects, and where does it all go in document.]
  Ken Laskey: (10:55) [discussion of need to define Proposition.  Not a term
that will resonate well with DoD audience]
  Ken Laskey: (10:55) how does proposition mesh with the idea of
requirements
  Ken Laskey: (11:21) ACTION: Frank to work on section for propositions
  Ken Laskey: (11:24) issue 85: accept with additional rewording
  Ken Laskey: (11:26) issue 86: reject for consistency with other diagrams
  Ken Laskey: (11:27) issue 87: accept
  Ken Laskey: (11:29) issue  88:reject per issue 86
  Ken Laskey: (11:32) issue 89: will include W3C reference
  Ken Laskey: (11:34) issue 90: no, can have multiple identifiers to same
resource but any identifier should unambiguously resolve to the intended
resource
  Ken Laskey: (11:46) issues 92-102: defer until see what is required to be
discussed as the rest of the document is developed
  Ken Laskey: (11:52) issue 4: accept
  Ken Laskey: (11:53) issue 29: accepted
  Ken Laskey: (13:21) 1. discuss governance at 22 August telecon following
on discussion and points Frank captured
  Ken Laskey: (13:23) 2. send out working draft v0.2 out for RM TC review.
Send out by 20 August with target date of 15 Septemebr for comments

------ End of Forwarded Message



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]