[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: Chat
-- ********************************************************************** "Speaking only for myself" Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com Community Music - http://www.mix2r.com My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury MAX 2007 - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/07/adobe-max-2007.html ********************************************************************** ------ Forwarded Message From: <dnickull@adobe.com> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:28:37 -0700 (PDT) To: <dnickull@adobe.com> Subject: Chat Duane Nickull: (8/15/2007 09:58) I emailed the chat hostiry so I cleared the box Duane Nickull: (09:58) hostiry = history Ken Laskey: (10:20) issue 84: accept. Need more discussion of Figure 5, partly from proposition material that was starngely numbered as 3.3.1.1 Ken Laskey: (10:27) Rex: for RA, we can only deal with measurable aspects of needs although some aspects may not be easily quantifiable. Ken Laskey: (10:27) Frank: need owner is one who decides whether need addressed Ken Laskey: (10:30) For this RA, a need is expressed by a measurable state? Ken Laskey: (10:34) [modifying text defining Need and following paragraphs] Ken Laskey: (10:44) [discussion of figs 5 and 9, whether redundant, whether different aspects, and where does it all go in document.] Ken Laskey: (10:55) [discussion of need to define Proposition. Not a term that will resonate well with DoD audience] Ken Laskey: (10:55) how does proposition mesh with the idea of requirements Ken Laskey: (11:21) ACTION: Frank to work on section for propositions Ken Laskey: (11:24) issue 85: accept with additional rewording Ken Laskey: (11:26) issue 86: reject for consistency with other diagrams Ken Laskey: (11:27) issue 87: accept Ken Laskey: (11:29) issue 88:reject per issue 86 Ken Laskey: (11:32) issue 89: will include W3C reference Ken Laskey: (11:34) issue 90: no, can have multiple identifiers to same resource but any identifier should unambiguously resolve to the intended resource Ken Laskey: (11:46) issues 92-102: defer until see what is required to be discussed as the rest of the document is developed Ken Laskey: (11:52) issue 4: accept Ken Laskey: (11:53) issue 29: accepted Ken Laskey: (13:21) 1. discuss governance at 22 August telecon following on discussion and points Frank captured Ken Laskey: (13:23) 2. send out working draft v0.2 out for RM TC review. Send out by 20 August with target date of 15 Septemebr for comments ------ End of Forwarded Message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]