[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] March 4 RA Telecom
Thanks Ken - I'll make the corrections as inserted below. Ken Laskey wrote: > see inline suggestions > > On Mar 5, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Don Flinn wrote: > >> Please send me any corrections or additions, then I will upload. >> >> ****************************************************** >> >> March 4 RA Telecom >> >> Version 0.3 has been sent out >> Ken wants feedback on versioning (use e-mail) >> >> Chris McDaniels will help on the security section >> ******************************** >> Agenda >> >> Tutorial >> Symposium >> Working Draft >> Vote to request comments >> Architectural implications and Flow >> Retire the WIKI >> Technical Material >> Governance >> ******************************* >> Discussions >> >> Symposium >> The RA Symposium Tutorial will be on Mon. 1:30 to 5:30 >> Only one presenter will get free tutorial access >> F to F for RA >> There will not be an official meeting but there will be informal >> get-togethers >> >> Working Draft >> Section 3 has been reorganized >> We will draft a "Request for Comments" from RM committee as a whole >> Aim for public draft by end of April >> We will entertain comments but may not address all of them because of >> time constraints >> News from Frank >> OMG SOA Standard will be approved by June - Draft to be out by Monday >> Open Group is also working on a document >> >> Working Draft con't >> If we add architectural implications we should add pointers early on >> in document >> >> Want the RM committee to approve the RA draft by April 3 > > I think approval by RM committee should be April 23 Got it. > >> We will request that they let us know of any major issues >> There will be time for detailed comments later >> >> Motion by Ken – >> “Move that we distribute version 0.3 to the full RM telling them that >> we would like to move to a committee draft and asking that, if there >> are major issues in doing that, that they inform us of those issues. >> We will request and adjudicate these more detailed issues soon >> thereafter in the coming months” >> Call for objections; No objections - Motion Accepted > > I expect these are the words on the MP3, but I'd suggest a slight change: > > We will request a full review from the RM committee within the next > few months and will adjudicate all detailed issues received from that > review. Is this the wording that you intend - “Move that we distribute version 0.3 to the full RM, telling them that we would like to move to a committee draft and asking that, if there are major issues in doing that, that they inform us of those issues. We will request a full review from the RM committee within the next few months and will adjudicate all detailed issues received from that review. > >> >> We will have a version 0.4 ready for distribution to the full RM by >> April 3 >> >> There should be a summary of the other sections near the beginning > > Was this meant to be a summary of architectural implications? Yes, I dropped the words "architectural implications" :-) >> >> In their respective sections >> Danny has modeled examples - Ken has discussed the architectural >> implications >> >> There was a discussion of the presentation of mechanisms as examples >> in the document and the use of architectural implications as >> presented by Ken >> Draw out general architectural implications from the models >> The question is - What should be the style for architectural >> implications? – >> Danny will attempt to construct implications for his sections; then >> he and Ken will discuss the best way to present architectural >> implications >> There should be consistency among all the sections >> >> We all need time to read the document >> >> WIKI retirement >> The WIKI is out of date >> Frank has an action item to either have it retired/deleted or put a >> disclaimer on each page >> >> Symposium >> Plan for contents of tutorial >> Start with Ken's presentation >> Have a completed plan by the end of March >> The presentation time limit is four hours >> >> Reference the RM in the beginning of the tutorial >> Ken to take first pass >> >> Homework: >> All go through service description section >> Next week we’ll finish the governance section >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Don Flinn >> President >> Mansurus LLC >> e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu <mailto:flinn@alum.mit.edu> >> Tel: 781-856-7230 >> http://mansurus.com >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >> generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs >> in OASIS >> at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ken Laskey > MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934 > 7151 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 > McLean VA 22102-7508 > > > > -- Don Flinn President Mansurus LLC e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu Tel: 781-856-7230 http://mansurus.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]