OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

soa-rm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title


Title: Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title
Thanks Duane. I think the distinction that you made in your second sentence below is significant, and it's the clarification that I was seeking in my posting yesterday with the subject "When Is An SOA Really An SOA?[1]" (it doesn't answer the primary general question, but it helps to address the grey area that I saw between our RM and SOA itself). I would like to request that we make this very clear up front in our spec, perhaps in more detailed wording (I about about 80% clear on it now).
 
Joe
 
[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/soa-rm/200505/msg00081.html
 

Joseph Chiusano

Booz Allen Hamilton

Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com



From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com]
Sent: Fri 5/6/2005 2:15 PM
To: Chiusano Joseph
Cc: Olson, Chandra S; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title

If it is in alignment with the definition in my email, then we have to
change the glossary.  SOA as a RM should probably not be specifically
tied to a certain class of implementors such as enterprises or only
large companies.

Duane

Chiusano Joseph wrote:

> Duane,

> I can clarify: By saying "if we buy into the fact that SOA is a type
> of Enterprise Architecture," I was referring to the definition of SOA
> at the end of our current draft, which states that SOA is a type of
> Enterprise Architecture.

> FWIW, my definition of EA in line with what you present below. Hope
> that helps.
> Joe

>
> Joseph Chiusano
>
> Booz Allen Hamilton
>
> Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
> <https://webmail.bah.com/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.boozallen.com/>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com]
> Sent: Fri 5/6/2005 1:01 PM
> To: Chiusano Joseph
> Cc: Olson, Chandra S; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Thoughts on document title
>
> I am intrigued by the premise of enterprise architecture.  My definition
> of EA is one of area of applicability, not any particular style of
> architecture such as mainframe, client server, etc.  What is your
> definition of EA?
>
> Duane
>
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>
> >
> > By this I mean that, if we buy into the fact that SOA is a type of
> > Enterprise Architecture,
>
>
> --
> ***********
> Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
> Chair - OASIS Service Oriented Architecture Reference Model Technical
> Committee -
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=soa-rm
> Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
> Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources  -
> http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html
> ***********
>

--
***********
Senior Standards Strategist - Adobe Systems, Inc. - http://www.adobe.com
Chair - OASIS Service Oriented Architecture Reference Model Technical Committee -
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=soa-rm
Vice Chair - UN/CEFACT Bureau Plenary - http://www.unece.org/cefact/
Adobe Enterprise Developer Resources  - http://www.adobe.com/enterprise/developer/main.html
***********



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]