[issue:content] draft 07, sect2.1.3.1, line 331, Is there a standard format/vocabulary for specifying a service description? (appears to contradict)

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

<current>

Line 331 states "However, the mechanisms to specify the service description should follow a standard, reference-able format that can accommodate the necessary variations and lend themselves to common processing tools (such as discovery engines) to manipulate the service description.". Earlier, line 288 stated that "The specification of a single description vocabulary is not only beyond the scope of this reference model; it is unlikely that such a single, general-purpose vocabulary exists or can be developed.". Although line 331's description refers to a "format" while line 288's description refers to a "vocbulary", the concepts appear close enough in terms of what they reference to be potentially contradictory. This may lead to the question "Is there a standard format/vocabulary for specifying a service description?"

</current>

 

<suggested>

Recommend updating line 331 wording to make clear what is meant by "format".

</suggested>

 

<notes>

</notes>

 

Kind Regards,

Joseph Chiusano

Booz Allen Hamilton

Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com