Re: [soa-rm] Called to a client meeting at 11:30 EST

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

Sally:

It would be improper for a chair to propose this but if you or Rebekah 
want to propose it, the TC will entertain it.

Duane

Sally St. Amand wrote:

> If you put up a vote I will go with #2
> Sally
>
>
> */Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>/* wrote:
>
>     Rebekah:
>
>     Thank you for the 'fore notice.
>
>     WRT the meeting time, if you wish I can set up a poll with the
>     following
>     options to see if there is consensus.
>
>     Meeting:
>
>     1. I am not in favour of changing the teleconference dates and times.
>     2. The current dates and times are not optimal for me. I prefer
>     another
>     day and time. [enter date and time preferred]
>
>     If we get enough #2's (not necessarily over 50% but more than the
>     amounts of 1's), we can then ask for proposed day/time combinations.
>
>     Would you like to make an electronic motion on the list to set
>     this up
>     and see if it gets seconded?
>
>     Duane
>
>     Metz Rebekah wrote:
>
>     >TC -
>     >
>     >I unfortunately have been called into a client meeting at 11:30 this
>     >morning. Although I will dial-in for the first few minutes of the
>     call
>     >to say hello; I ! will not be able to participate in the
>     discussions on
>     >the call today.
>     >
>     >I do hope that we discuss the timing and frequency of the conferences
>     >calls - at least get a poll of alternative times to hold this call. I
>     >am finding that many client meetings conflict with our current
>     timeslot.
>     >
>     >
>     >I look forward to hearing you all again in the near future.
>     >
>     >Rebekah
>     >
>     >Rebekah Metz
>     >Associate
>     >Booz Allen Hamilton
>     >Voice: (703) 377-1471
>     >Fax: (703) 902-3457
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>