[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Definition(s) of "service"
What I liked about the sentence was that it seemed to say as little as possible. I am concerned that at the very basic level of "service" any unnecessary properties specified could ripple and create unwanted restrictions later. On 7/28/05, Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> wrote: > Since I've already differed with the aforementioned esteemed colleague > on a list internal to my company, I think I can very respectfully differ > with another very esteemed colleague here.:) My response: > > <Quote> > I would also assert that the shoe shining service exists even before its > very first use, and that a service is a nuon rather than a verb. The act > of performing the function provided by the service is the > "actionalization" of the behavior that the service exhibits. > </Quote> > > Joe > > Joseph Chiusano > Booz Allen Hamilton > O: 703-902-6923 > C: 202-251-0731 > Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Metz Rebekah [mailto:metz_rebekah@bah.com] > > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 12:35 PM > > To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Definition(s) of "service" > > > > Quoting from an esteemed colleague: > > > > "In simple terms, the definition of service is "the > > performance of a function by one for another." So "service" > > does not equal "function". > > Shoe shining is a function. I can offer to shine shoes. > > Until I shine someone's shoes, I have not provided a service. > > > > This distinction makes sense when one considers the nature of > > a contract. An offer is the first element of a contract, > > with acceptance and consideration being the > > others....[Consider that] two providers may offer to perform > > the same function, but their offers are separate and distinct." > > > > The more we work through these definitions; the importance of > > precision becomes more apparent... > > > > So, in a roundabout sort of way, I believe that I'm agreeing > > with Matt about "...carries out". > > > > Rebekah > > > > Rebekah Metz > > Associate > > Booz Allen Hamilton > > Voice: (703) 377-1471 > > Fax: (703) 902-3457 > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:mattm@adobe.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 8:11 AM > > > To: Chiusano Joseph > > > Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org > > > Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Definition(s) of "service" > > > > > > Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > > > > > >Rather than think of a service as a boundary to something, can it > > also > > > >be thought of as an entity that encapsulates (or "carries > > out") a set > > of > > > >behaviors? > > > > > > > > > > > I'm with "...carries out a set of behaviours." > > > > > > -matt > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]