[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Future content for Conf calls
+1 - champagne is mine!!! D Peter F Brown wrote: >I'd also suggest: > >- pre-meeting offer should be made to scribe (avoids that embarrasing >foot-shuffling that you can practically hear on call): first offer posted to >the list, gets the job; No proposal: last one to offer gets no dessert or >has to invite whole TC to dinner at next F2F; >- tweaks to the minutes: send a mail to the scribe of the meeting concerned, >copy to list; >- on call: minutes of previous meeting(s) deemed approved without discussion >or decision unless before end of meeting there is an objection (by mail or >point of order); >-reports from liaisons and editors in writing to list before meeting (at >least the key points) >- install webcam on Ken's car so that we can be sure he is actually driving >and keeping his eyes on the road... >- a large dose of common sense: it's great to talk to people on call that >you haven't seen at all or in a while, and to keep things a bit fun, but >bear in mind that time is money (and outside the US and Canada, the call is >costing a buck a minute at least - that's equivalent to my individual OASIS >member fee in three meetings) and that some things really can be dealth with >off line... >- keep the creative flow of the meeting going by allowing overtalk and >interrupts where appropriate but also keep to the point: the "threads" on >call can be worse than on the list: with the quality of the line sometimes >making this all the worse. Duane, you may have to practice being a bit more >ruthless while you're on parental leave... ;-) > >All the best, and a glass of champagne in Vienna to the first on the list to >give this a +1 ... > >-Peter > >-----Original Message----- >From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] >Sent: 25 August 2005 01:27 >Cc: SOA-RM >Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Future content for Conf calls > >Example: > >An unnecessarily long discussion on suggested alternative dates (at least >the portion that could be done prior to the meeting). A discussion over the >OASIS rules and procedures etc. > >Both of these can probably be best done using the WIKI or list server or at >least a substantial portion thereof. > >Duane > >Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > > >>Sounds good to me Duane. For clarification, can you provide an example >>of what would be considered administrivia (beyond taking roll call)? >> >>Joe >> >>Joseph Chiusano >>Booz Allen Hamilton >>O: 703-902-6923 >>C: 202-251-0731 >>Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] >>>Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 5:16 PM >>>To: SOA-RM >>>Subject: [soa-rm] Future content for Conf calls >>> >>>TC: >>> >>>Matt said something that tweaked my thinking a bit today. >>> >>>I would like to try and keep the use of the conference calls largely >>>for technical work and confine administrivia to a minimum. Perhaps >>>most of this can be done via the list. >>> >>>Accordingly, I would look to the editing team and others to suggest >>>topics that need to be discussed on the next calls. >>> >>>D. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]