[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [soa-blueprints] RE: [soa-rm] JtC = cross post solution (was) ... Re: The real SOA challenge?
A guiding philosophy of the SOA-RM effort
has been to provide a foundational work that has very few dependencies on
external work. It is important to me, as an SOA-RM founder, that we have
diverse representation on the TC from other SOA groups, I just don’t want
to network them in the
Our plan has always been to work on some reference architectures once the RM is complete. These RAs would need to reference blueprints and other specifications.
From: Ramesh Loganathan
The OASIS SOA Reference Model should refer to the SOA blueprints. In the draft-10 (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/15389/wd-soa-rm-10.pdf) there is an overview in sec 1.1. This section could put the Blueprints also in perspective. Probably in the "Related Work" group.
From: Oleg Mikulinsky [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:10 AM
To: James Bryce Clark; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: [soa-blueprints] RE: [soa-rm] JtC = cross post solution (was) ... Re: The real SOA challenge?
I also like the idea of having a committee that explains SOA related
work and all of the various OASIS WS-* protocol working groups to the
This might be a starting point for the proposed TC.
"Introduction to the OASIS SOA Work: The Reference Model and SOA
Blueprints Technical Committees"
Please chip in your proposed FAQ as well.
From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:52 PM
To: James Bryce Clark; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: RE: [soa-rm] JtC = cross post solution (was) ... Re: The real
[Replying on SOA-RM TC list only]
Let me be the first to say that I think a "service-oriented architecture
joint committee" is an *excellent* idea.
Booz Allen Hamilton
Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:46 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com;
> firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
> Subject: [soa-rm] JtC = cross post solution (was) ... Re: The real SOA
> 1. Reply to Joe and John: I hope so.
> 2. Request to all: This interesting but long thread is going on
> in five e-mail lists. These TCs have much in common, that properly is
> a basis for further chat, but while maintaining the separate and
> independent activities of each TC. I would like to suggest a
> solution. It would take some duplicate traffic off these lists, and
> provide a place for these cross-TC, SOA-oriented coordination
> I suggest that these 5 TCs consider starting a "service
> architecture joint committee." The rules of that OASIS structure can
> be found at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#2.16. It
> does not require any surrender of each committee's own work plan or
> views, but would provide a forum for discussion of possible voluntary
> coordination. I will take this up further with your committee chairs,
> and discuss what kind of charter/outline might work. If the TCs (or
> some subset of
> them) wish to do so, a JtC would create a place where matters of joint
> interest can be more effectively discussed.
> Regards Jamie
> ~ James Bryce Clark
> ~ Director, Standards Development, OASIS
> ~ firstname.lastname@example.org
> At 08:39 AM 11/17/2005, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> >>From: John Hardin [mailto:email@example.com]
> >>Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:29 AM
> >>* * *
> >>We are working these three items into the next generation
> of the OASIS
> >>Technical Architecture.
> >I believe you meant to say "ebXML Technical Architecture"?