RE: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

Since Duane asked the party for clarification on the negative vote 
reasoning, I don't think more than a week is called for in this case, 
given that we have not yet heard from that party.

Cheers,
Rex

At 8:38 AM -0400 10/2/06, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>I second Tom's suggestion - I think it is very fair to both sides.
>
>Joe
>
>Joseph Chiusano
>Associate
>Booz Allen Hamilton
>
>700 13th St. NW, Suite 1100
>Washington, DC 20005
>O: 202-508-6514 
>C: 202-251-0731
>Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tom Merkle [mailto:TMerkle@capwin.org]
>Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 8:20 AM
>To: Jones, Steve G; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard
>
>In all fairness, I propose we allow the "no" voter one week to provide a
>detailed analysis of what they consider is wrong or missing with the
>SOA-RM specification. If no new information is provided then we move the
>specification to a standard.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Tom Merkle
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jones, Steve G [mailto:steve.g.jones@capgemini.com]
>Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 4:58 AM
>To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: FW: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard
>
>
>I propose we submit to full specification.  One negative vote against 89
>positives is a pretty ringing endorsement in anyone's book.
>Particularly given the comment on the no vote I don't see why we
>wouldn't shift to standard.
>
>Steve
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org]
>Sent: 02 October 2006 00:25
>To: members@lists.oasis-open.org; tc-announce@lists.oasis-open.org
>Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard
>
>OASIS members:
>
>The ballots for approval of Reference Model for Service Oriented
>Architecture v1.0 as an OASIS Standard (announced at [1]) has closed.
>There were sufficient affirmative votes to approve the specification.
>However, because there was a negative vote, the SOA Reference Model
>Technical Committee must decide how to proceed, as provided in the OASIS
>TC Process, at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#3.4. A
>further announcement will be made to this list regarding their
>disposition of the vote.
>
>Mary
>
>[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/members/200609/msg00002.html
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>Mary P McRae
>Manager of TC Administration, OASIS
>email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
>web: www.oasis-open.org
>
>
>This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
>and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the
>person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,
>you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,
>distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this
>message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all
>copies of this message.


-- 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-849-2309