Re: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

Steve:

We have to follow due process.  They are commenting on the 1.0 spec and we
have to consider their input for the decision of whether or not to proceed
to a full standard.  We need to understand if Avaya has found something in
the spec which we all missed.  Let's give them a fair chance to do so.

Duane


On 10/2/06 6:01 AM, "Jones, Steve G" <steve.g.jones@capgemini.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> To play devils advocate here (I'm on a retainer) we've received 89 yes
> votes, and for the last several months people have had ample opportunity.
> If Avaya flesh out areas of concern this will either mean we ignore them
> (otherwise we have to go back through the cycle) or we make the changes
> which means it counts as an entirely new submission.
> 
> I'd propose that we get the feedback and consider it within the scope of a
> 1.1 proposal.  
> 
> A vague concern that it allows things to be defined as SOA that aren't in
> the opinion of the voter SOA doesn't out weight the over 25% of OASIS voters
> (10% above target) who thought that it did.  Lets shift to standard and then
> look at revisions within the scope of a 1.1 or a 2.0.
> 
> Steve
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
> Sent: 02 October 2006 13:38
> To: Tom Merkle; Jones, Steve G; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard
> 
> I second Tom's suggestion - I think it is very fair to both sides.
> 
> Joe
> 
> Joseph Chiusano
> Associate
> Booz Allen Hamilton
>  
> 700 13th St. NW, Suite 1100
> Washington, DC 20005
> O: 202-508-6514  
> C: 202-251-0731
> Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Merkle [mailto:TMerkle@capwin.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 8:20 AM
> To: Jones, Steve G; soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard
> 
> In all fairness, I propose we allow the "no" voter one week to provide a
> detailed analysis of what they consider is wrong or missing with the
> SOA-RM specification. If no new information is provided then we move the
> specification to a standard.
> 
> 
> Regards,
>  
> Tom Merkle
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jones, Steve G [mailto:steve.g.jones@capgemini.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 4:58 AM
> To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: FW: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard
> 
> 
> I propose we submit to full specification.  One negative vote against 89
> positives is a pretty ringing endorsement in anyone's book.
> Particularly given the comment on the no vote I don't see why we
> wouldn't shift to standard.
> 
> Steve
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org]
> Sent: 02 October 2006 00:25
> To: members@lists.oasis-open.org; tc-announce@lists.oasis-open.org
> Cc: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [soa-rm] Result of Voting on SOA-RM v1.0 as OASIS Standard
> 
> OASIS members:
> 
> The ballots for approval of Reference Model for Service Oriented
> Architecture v1.0 as an OASIS Standard (announced at [1]) has closed.
> There were sufficient affirmative votes to approve the specification.
> However, because there was a negative vote, the SOA Reference Model
> Technical Committee must decide how to proceed, as provided in the OASIS
> TC Process, at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#3.4. A
> further announcement will be made to this list regarding their
> disposition of the vote.
> 
> Mary
> 
> [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/members/200609/msg00002.html
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Mary P McRae
> Manager of TC Administration, OASIS
> email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
> web: www.oasis-open.org
> 
> 
> This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
> and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the
> person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,
> you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,
> distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this
> message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all
> copies of this message.
> 
> This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and
> is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to
> whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,  you are not
> authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,  distribute, or use this
> message or any part thereof. If you receive this  message in error, please
> notify the sender immediately and delete all  copies of this message.
> 

-- 
******************************************************
Sr. Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc.       *
Chair - OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical Committee*
Blog: http://technoracle.blogspot.com                *
******************************************************