[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Use Case 2.0 article
Luckily, MITRE has a CACM subscription. I found the Principles for Use-Case Adoption to be to the point: 1. Keep it simple by telling stories 2. Understand the big picture 3. Focus on value 4. Build the system in slices 5. Deliver the system in increments 6. Adapt to meet the team’s needs. The titles are good enough even without the associated text. To the point of user stories vs. use cases, I don’t see how one get a quality use case without the SME or why the SME is more critical the the user story. I think we’ve all seen the situation where the requirements, in whatever form captured, is a contract deliverable and the staff compiling the requirements has to generate paper from whatever knowledge base they can bring to bear. If anything, the goal should be to keep the error consequences low so we can remediate when we find the requirements — user stories or use cases/slices — are lacking. Ken ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Kenneth Laskey MITRE Corporation, M/S F510 phone: 703-983-7934 7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 McLean VA 22102-7508
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]