Dear all in SOATEL, Dear Mike, Dear Mary
I have read all emails circulated yesterday in the mailing list and I have understood that
- we should have approved a CD02 document containing the non-substantive changes to the Use Case document which passed the Public review
- the document I proposed yesterday to the TC had a typo (16 Feb 2009 instead of 16 Feb 2010). Thanks to the colleague who spotted it.
- all links in the first page (This Version, latest version) of the document voted yesterday are wrong because they refer to the PR01 CD01 modified.
So, in order to avoid any misunderstanding and complaints and in order to respect the TC processes and procedures I propose to
- withdraw the document approved yesterday
- I take the action of preparing a “correct” Committee Draft 02
- Mike, the Chair, calls a special approval meeting, possibly next Tuesday, February 23, usual time (so we avoid waiting 2 weeks)
- The meeting is held(Feb 23 if possible), if quorum, Voting members (3, Ronco, Rossini, Giordano) approve the CD02
- Mary gets CD02 + meeting notes and runs the ballot
If we all agree I hope that in one week’s time all is correctly handled
Kind regards
Enrico
-----Original Message-----
From: Mary McRae [
mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org]
Sent: martedì 16 febbraio 2010 21.15
To: Giordano, Michael (Michael)
Cc: soa-tel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [soa-tel] Re: Electronic Ballot
Hi Michael,
You can't make any changes to CD01/PR01; it's a committee approved document that's been submitted for public review. If any changes have been made the TC will need to approve the revised document as a new Committee Draft (CD02). Once that has happened
please provide the link to the meeting minutes where the TC approved the document as CD02 and agreed that no substantive changes were made as well as the CD02 document itself.
Thanks,
Mary
On Feb 16, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Giordano, Michael (Michael) wrote:
> We voted gibe the nature of the comment and it was not substantive. The
> detail is in the spreadsheet we provided and communicated across the
> community.
>
> We did make minor tweaks and deleted come graphics in the link I
> supplied but the changes were again not substantive as documented.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 2:06 PM
> To: Giordano, Michael (Michael)
> Subject: Re: Electronic Ballot
>
> Thanks Michael,
>
> Is the version of the Use Cases document that went for Public Review
> the one to be considered for CS? Or was another version produced? If
> another version was created the TC will need to vote that no changes
> were substantive.
>
> Mary
>
>
>
> On Feb 16, 2010, at 8:57 AM, Giordano, Michael (Michael) wrote:
>
>>
>> Mary,
>>
>> Is it possible to set up an electronic ballot for this use case
>> document. The 4 remaining voting members are:
>>
>> Giordano, Mr. Mike, giordano@avaya.com
>> Renner, Mr. Olaf, olaf.renner@nsn.com
>> RONCO, Enrico, enrico.ronco@telecomitalia.it
>> Rossini, Dr. Federico, federico.rossini@telecomitalia.it
>>
>>
>>
>> or%20CS%20vote.doc
>>
>> We have final review of our requirements document today. Actions are:
>>
>> 1) Approve the Reqs document as CD pending the approval of the Use
> Cases
>> doc.
>> 2) Put the doc in hold and wait for the electronic ballot for the use
>> cases document
>> 3) Once the use cases doc is approved as CS, we will pass it to you to
>> start the public eval period
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mike Giordano
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non è necessario.