Re: [stdsreg] Metadata Specification v2.8

[Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>]

Maxx wrote:

> In this case, I think there would have to be four metadata records,
> one for each of the documents, with Relation fields pointing between
> them.

There is no Relation field. Do you mean "Related Resources": if so this is
wrong because this field is intended for non-normative references. If you
meant Referenced Standards this would also be a misuse of the field. We have
no direct source for describing "other related records" at present, which is
a major cause for concern if we are going to have records that are exactly
analogous.

What about standards that have multilingual titles? Do they also need one
record per title or do all the titles sit in the single Title element the
record is allowed? If there are multiple records how do we indicated that
there is a direct relationship between the records?

Martin Bryan