ERR Re: [tag] TA Model: what goes at the head of a TA?

[stephen.green@systml.co.uk]

ERR:
> I suggest we reflect this aspect (for alignment with the UML and
> because we emphasize it in the supporting reference material) in
> the head area of the TA - alongside aspects like pre-requisites
> and the TA identifier - since it might relate to the grouping of

  correction: NOT alongside the TA Identifier - I meant the
  outer wrapper of all the TAs rather than at individual TA level

-- 
Stephen Green

Partner
SystML, http://www.systml.co.uk
Tel: +44 (0) 117 9541606

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice



Quoting stephen.green@systml.co.uk:

> In looking at UML there is a third main category of the UML Model,
> relating both to Foundational structures and dynamic Behaviours.
> It is the aspect which deals with modules and the like (Model
> Management).
>
> I suggest we reflect this aspect (for alignment with the UML and
> because we emphasize it in the supporting reference material) in
> the head area of the TA - alongside aspects like pre-requisites
> and the TA identifier - since it might relate to the grouping of
> TAs into a list or lists. I propose we have some cross references
> to identifiers or names of specification modules, profiles, etc.
> How about a 'Specification Module Cross Reference' and also a
> 'Specification Profile Cross Reference' along with a 'Specification
> Comment' which could include information on whether there is any
> derivation, extension or deviation from the Spec referenced. All
> optional.
>
> Maybe there needs to be something like that at TA level too.
>
> -- 
> Stephen Green
>
> Partner
> SystML, http://www.systml.co.uk
> Tel: +44 (0) 117 9541606
>
> http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice