Making the Process better

["Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>]

In order to structure the debate(s) a litttle better  the two co-chairs (Patrick and Jacques) suggest that we adopt the following rules:

 

1. People having some "guideline section"  assignments, will post versions of these whenever they should / are ready.

 

2. If they get editorial comments / complaints, they fix these. But if some content is controversial and raises discussion on the mailing list (or in the editor's head), the editor must extract a corresponding "issue"  and post it on our wiki (discussion/issues) , and the discussion is to resume on this wiki thread.

 

3. At some point, when the "issue"  has been sufficiently beaten-up, either a consensus or a vote occurs to make a decision on how to resolve it.

 

 

From the latest "TA Anatomy" posting (V0.5) and follow-up discussion, I figure that 4 issues are to be resolved by the TC before going further. I just posted them on the wiki under "discussion/issues":

see issues #11, #12, #13, #14

 

Also, proposed a resolution / illustration on issue #9.

 

Regards,

Jacques