Re: [tag] Making the Process better

[stephen.green@systml.co.uk]

Added my comments to the issues page.
-- 
Stephen Green

Partner
SystML, http://www.systml.co.uk
Tel: +44 (0) 117 9541606

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice



Quoting "Durand, Jacques R." <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>:

> In order to structure the debate(s) a litttle better  the two co-chairs
> (Patrick and Jacques) suggest that we adopt the following rules:
>
> 1. People having some "guideline section"  assignments, will post
> versions of these whenever they should / are ready.
>
> 2. If they get editorial comments / complaints, they fix these. But if
> some content is controversial and raises discussion on the mailing list
> (or in the editor's head), the editor must extract a corresponding
> "issue"  and post it on our wiki (discussion/issues) , and the
> discussion is to resume on this wiki thread.
>
> 3. At some point, when the "issue"  has been sufficiently beaten-up,
> either a consensus or a vote occurs to make a decision on how to resolve
> it.
>
>
> From the latest "TA Anatomy" posting (V0.5) and follow-up discussion, I
> figure that 4 issues are to be resolved by the TC before going further.
> I just posted them on the wiki under "discussion/issues":
> see issues #11, #12, #13, #14
>
> Also, proposed a resolution / illustration on issue #9.
>
> Regards,
> Jacques
>