PDF: TestAssertionsGuidelines-draft-0-9-9-9-in-progress-1.pdf

[Stephen Green <stephen.green@documentengineeringservices.com>]

Here is the same in PDF

2009/1/15 Stephen Green <stephen.green@documentengineeringservices.com>:
> The attached file, which I've temporarily called
> "0-9-9-9-in-progress-1", seems to me to
> have all the work we have completed so far. If we need another 'draft
> of this draft' prior
> to any TC vote we could call it "0-9-9-9-in-progress-2" and so on.
>
> Would we wait until we have decided on a committee draft before asking Dmitry to
> check it again (or those parts which have changed since last time anyway)?
>
> Could this be the draft we vote on whether or not to approve it as a
> commitee draft?
>
> I take it it has to go through the process:
>
> committee draft (voted)
> Dmitry's checking
> any changes
> committee draft (voted)
> committee spec (voted)
> public review spec (voted)
> committee spec (if no changes after review)
>
> [if changes after review then
> the whole cycle maybe starts again]
>
> Best regards
>
> Steve
>
> --
> Stephen D. Green
>
> Document Engineering Services Ltd
>
>
>
> http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice
>



-- 
Stephen D. Green

Document Engineering Services Ltd



http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice

TestAssertionsGuidelines-draft-0-9-9-9-in-progress-1.pdf