Re: [tag] TestAssertionsGuidelines-draft-0-9-9-9-in-progress-1.doc

[Stephen Green <stephen.green@documentengineeringservices.com>]

I note from the TC process rules for spec quality
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process-2008-06-19.php#specQuality
there are few things we have to do too, prior to public review,
even though the TA Guidelines aren't going through Standard -
e.g. it looks like we still need a conf clause and to designate
sections normative or informative (I guess we say everything is
informative).

2009/1/20 Durand, Jacques R. <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>:
> So the process now would be:
>
> - tomorrow (Wed) we approve this V0.999 as a Committee Draft (CD).
> - This Wed, decide of last proposed pending updates if needed, then
> Dimitri review.
> Both result in a new draft produced by Tuesday 27.
> - Wed 28 we start an electronic ballot (1 week) for  approving the
> latest, as both new CD and "Public Review" draft.
> - then we proceed with the public review, contact people, etc.
>
> Any comments?
>
>
> Jacques
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stephengreenubl@gmail.com [mailto:stephengreenubl@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Stephen Green
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 3:16 PM
> To: TAG TC
> Subject: [tag] TestAssertionsGuidelines-draft-0-9-9-9-in-progress-1.doc
>
> The attached file, which I've temporarily called
> "0-9-9-9-in-progress-1", seems to me to have all the work we have
> completed so far. If we need another 'draft of this draft' prior to any
> TC vote we could call it "0-9-9-9-in-progress-2" and so on.
>
> Would we wait until we have decided on a committee draft before asking
> Dmitry to check it again (or those parts which have changed since last
> time anyway)?
>
> Could this be the draft we vote on whether or not to approve it as a
> commitee draft?
>
> I take it it has to go through the process:
>
> committee draft (voted)
> Dmitry's checking
> any changes
> committee draft (voted)
> committee spec (voted)
> public review spec (voted)
> committee spec (if no changes after review)
>
> [if changes after review then
> the whole cycle maybe starts again]
>
> Best regards
>
> Steve
>
> --
> Stephen D. Green
>
> Document Engineering Services Ltd
>
>
>
> http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice
>



-- 
Stephen D. Green

Document Engineering Services Ltd



http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice