[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [tag] PDF: TestAssertionsGuidelines-draft-0-9-9-9-in-progress-1.pdf
will do, thanks Steve 2009/1/16 Durand, Jacques R. <JDurand@us.fujitsu.com>: > Stephen: > > A few editorial comments for the next rev: > > - Fig 1 and 2 must now be Fig2 and 3 due to new fig at beginning (edits > for me..). > > - I am questioning the need for the subsection title: 3.7.1 "Composition > of Assertions". > Suggest to simply remove this title (which I find also a little > ambiguous) and keep the rest of the content as is. After all we don't > have 3.7.2... So all current content would be directly under 3.7. > > - Appendicx C: the second set of refs is titled Test Assertions > Methodology, while it should be : Test Assertions Examples. > > > Cheers, > Jacques > > -----Original Message----- > From: stephengreenubl@gmail.com [mailto:stephengreenubl@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Stephen Green > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 3:35 PM > To: TAG TC > Subject: [tag] PDF: > TestAssertionsGuidelines-draft-0-9-9-9-in-progress-1.pdf > > Here is the same in PDF > > 2009/1/15 Stephen Green <stephen.green@documentengineeringservices.com>: >> The attached file, which I've temporarily called >> "0-9-9-9-in-progress-1", seems to me to have all the work we have >> completed so far. If we need another 'draft of this draft' prior to >> any TC vote we could call it "0-9-9-9-in-progress-2" and so on. >> >> Would we wait until we have decided on a committee draft before asking > >> Dmitry to check it again (or those parts which have changed since last > time anyway)? >> >> Could this be the draft we vote on whether or not to approve it as a >> commitee draft? >> >> I take it it has to go through the process: >> >> committee draft (voted) >> Dmitry's checking >> any changes >> committee draft (voted) >> committee spec (voted) >> public review spec (voted) >> committee spec (if no changes after review) >> >> [if changes after review then >> the whole cycle maybe starts again] >> >> Best regards >> >> Steve >> >> -- >> Stephen D. Green >> >> Document Engineering Services Ltd >> >> >> >> http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice >> > > > > -- > Stephen D. Green > > Document Engineering Services Ltd > > > > http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice > -- Stephen D. Green Document Engineering Services Ltd http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+22:37 .. and voice
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]