[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tax] Comments on XML Position Paper
Unfortunately I have no time to go into details, just a short reaction: >>(such as my example of UK PAYE tax and National Insurance contributions records)<< Where can I find these? I am not sure if i saw this example? >>I simply think there is a boundary to XBRL's applicability somewhere, and there are some existing systems with which I'm familiar that I believe fall outside that boundary (and some that fall within it). We would do well to identify the boundary for those administrations who have yet to implement systems.<< I fully agree with you here. I know that not all of my colleagues agree with me, but in my opinion there are very few data territories where accountants/auditors should not be interested in. Regards, _____________________________ Marc van Hilvoorde PricewaterhouseCoopers Global Risk Management Solutions Andy Greener <andy@gid.co.uk> To: tax@lists.oasis-open.org 18-03-2004 12:52 cc: Subject: RE: [tax] Comments on XML Position Paper At 10:39 am +0100 16/3/04, marc.van.hilvoorde@nl.pwc.com wrote: >I liked your comments on the differences between accountants and computer >scientists looking at data differently. But the assessement and certifying >of information is still an accountants job (I am not sure if they are >really capable of doing this, but this is another topic). That gives us a >reason for meddling, I think. It would seem to come down to the issue of where you draw the line around what accountants (primarily) are interested in, as opposed to what computer systems (primarily) are interested in. XBRL is a (good) attempt at providing accounting data in a form that accountants (and their tools) can get to grips with. There is obvious benefit in developing Taxonomies that cover that domain so that, as you say, you get true re-usability (and we mustn't forget interoperability too). That may be 'taxutopia' for accountants, but it is only a subset of the information that regulators or tax authorities need. There are transactions (such as my example of UK PAYE tax and National Insurance contributions records) that never go near an accountant (either within IR or the employers running the PAYE payroll deduction schemes). These are largely application-to-application data transfers, and whilst it may be a little optimistic at the moment to say they are serialised objects passing from one system to another, it is not far short of the truth. In these cases, the imposition of XBRL is unnecessary, and I would even go as far as to say it would be a hindrance. I simply think there is a boundary to XBRL's applicability somewhere, and there are some existing systems with which I'm familiar that I believe fall outside that boundary (and some that fall within it). We would do well to identify the boundary for those administrations who have yet to implement systems. Andy -- Andy Greener Mob: +44 7836 331933 GID Ltd, Reading, UK Tel: +44 118 956 1248 andy@gid.co.uk Fax: +44 118 958 9005 To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tax/members/leave_workgroup.php . _________________________________________________________________ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]