[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [tax] Issues for v2.0 of position paper
On Thursday 08 Jul 2004 13:28, marc.van.hilvoorde@nl.pwc.com wrote: > My point here: I also think that transportation is less relevant, but > transportation is linked to security. And i do think security is > relevant. I'm afraid I disagree about security. My own experience of government projects is that there is a huge gap between the original specs which demand absolute security and the actual implementations which tend to be much closer to conventional communications (i.e. very little security at all). In the UK, at least, there is no movement towards a consensus. My worry is that if Tax XML starts worrying about security issues we will never reach agreement and it will significantly reduce the chances of success for the project. Just my two penn'orth. -- Philip Allen, Chairman DecisionSoft Limited +44-1865-203192 http://www.decisionsoft.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]