[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tgf] Fw: OASIS TGF TC - 16th OCTOBER MEETING PAPERS
Thanks to Chris for his edits. I've cut this into the CN template as WD03 attached. I've excluded the Notes columns in the tables as they do seem to be unnecessary. It would be good, unless there are any major objections, if we could approve this draft for Public Review on our call tomorrow. I do think we need some feedback from the outside world on the value and content of this CN so getting this out without too much more head-scratching on our part should be the approach IMO. John -------------------------------------------- On Tue, 14/10/14, Chris Parker <chris.parker@cstransform.com> wrote: Subject: RE: [tgf] Fw: OASIS TGF TC - 16th OCTOBER MEETING PAPERS To: "John Borras" <johnaborras@yahoo.co.uk>, "TGF TC List" <tgf@lists.oasis-open.org> Date: Tuesday, 14 October, 2014, 14:24 Dear all I attach a version of Nig’s paper with some suggested changes marked up in revisions mode. Basically, I have done two things: · Topped and tailed Nig’s text, with a short intro section (to explain why you might want to read the document and how it is structured) and a conclusion (prompted by Colin’s suggestions).· Expanded the cross-references in the tables so they give the whole pattern name, not just its number (so that the reader does not need to keep referring back to the diagram to see what we’re talking about). I had also planned to draft a sentence or so on each pattern to go in the ‘notes’ section of the table, explaining briefly why it was relevant to the IoT characteristic being discussed. But in the end I have abandoned the attempt – because my explanations were either so short that they added little to that which is implicit in the pattern title, or were starting to get so long that the combined effect was excessive. Maybe others could come up with pithier one-liners for each pattern than I’ve managed to. If not, my thinking is that we should simply delete the ‘notes’ columns from the tables. I think that Nig’s intro text above each table, coupled with the expanded cross-references to named patterns, is enough to show why the TGF is relevant without duplicating the TGF. Looking forward to the call on Thursday. Regards, Chris ParkerManaging PartnerCS Transform Limitedwww.cstransform.comT: +44 7951 754060F: +44 207 681 3908 Citizen Service Transformation From: tgf@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tgf@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of John Borras Sent: 13 October 2014 09:13 To: TGF TC List Subject: [tgf] Fw: OASIS TGF TC - 16th OCTOBER MEETING PAPERS Attached are the papers and call details for our TC call on Thursday. Any further thoughts on Nig's latest paper would be appreciated before the meeting. Peter is hoping to have a draft paper for consideration under Item 4. A note of any absences would be welcomed in advance. Finally just a reminder that this call is at 07.30 UK / 08.30 CEST / 02.30 EST / 23.30 PST (15th) / 19.30 NZ / 16.30 AUS. John --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Attachment:
TGF-IoT-Impact-v1.0-wd03.doc
Description: MS-Word document
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]