[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [tm-pubsubj-comment] ISSUE 10 - PSIs "name" "subject" and"description"
At 15:38 24/04/02 +0000, Murray Altheim wrote: >>dc:subject is unnecessary on PSIs. We only need its equivalent >>on PSI sets. (See separate posting, on ISSUE 9, proposing to call >>this "keywords", to avoid confusion.) > >Huh? I would have thought this one of the more *important* ones. >Why would we only want this on sets? Individual PSIs have a subject. Of course every PSI indicates a subject (in topic map terms). That's why we have them. But what would it mean to have a metadata property called "subject" on a PSI? What would be the value of that property? Steve -- Steve Pepper, Chief Executive Officer <pepper@ontopia.net> Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG3 Editor, XTM (XML Topic Maps) Ontopia AS, Waldemar Thranes gt. 98, N-0175 Oslo, Norway. http://www.ontopia.net/ phone: +47-23233080 GSM: +47-90827246
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC