[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [tm-pubsubj] Clarification of OASIS TC and W3C WG
Thanks, Bernard, for the link. However, I am afraid that this FAQ page will be too sophisticated for a layman to understand. And that is why I suggested before that we should give some good examples (e.g., RDDL's Natures & Purposes) to illustrate the "business value" of published subjects. To that end I wonder if the RDF community is also struggling with this same issue, although I know Bernard's FAQ has some links to RDF-related pages. Perhaps the use cases under development should include scenarios for the use of published subjects within the context of different metadata approaches (e.g., XTM, RDF, Dublin Core, UDDI, etc.). Have a good weekend. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Bernard Vatant [mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 2:48 PM To: Tsao, Scott Subject: Re: [tm-pubsubj] Clarification of OASIS TC and W3C WG Scott > There is a question raised by my colleagues: "Could you clarify for me how > the 2 TCs you describe relate to the Semantic Web work in the W3C? For > instance, how will PubSubj be different than RDF? Or, why is it needed in > addition to RDF?" I had try to adress this issue in the introduction of http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tm-pubsubj/docs/works/questions.htm Hope that helps. Bernard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC